Learn about the serious reductions in our food’s nutrients in the past 100 years, and why homegrown produce is naturally superior.
Any home gardener will tell you supermarket produce is no match for freshly picked fruits and vegetables. But that’s more than lip service or homegrown pride. Actually, there’s plenty of scientific evidence to suggest that backyard produce doesn’t just taste better — it’s more nutritious, too.
In the United States, we consume an overabundance of calories, yet around a third of us don’t get the recommended levels of magnesium, vitamin A and vitamin C — all nutrients we get from plants, which we have more year-round access to than ever before. So what gives?
Part of the answer may lie in the plants themselves and how we process them. Instead of simply eating more servings of fruits and vegetables, we might want to focus on ensuring those servings are rich in the nutrients that do the hard work of keeping us healthy in the first place.
Large-scale agricultural producers utilize everything from fertilizers and pesticides to plowing and selective breeding to increase the uniformity and yield of crops. But in doing so, they may be inadvertently decreasing those crops’ ability to nourish us. Researchers have found a marked decline in the nutritional value of fresh food over the last 100 years. Today’s produce pales in nutritional value with fruits and vegetables grown before those agricultural practices became common, and many studies back that up.
The first federal funding for human nutrition research in the United States was earmarked in 1893, in large part because of the work of an American chemist named Wilbur Olin Atwater.
Atwater was one of few scientists at the time devoted to the studies of human nutrition and metabolism. His work in the late 19th and early 20th centuries informed much of what we now understand about food and nutrition.
Research by Robert Alexander McCance and Elsie Widdowson at King’s College University of London further advanced our understanding of food’s chemical compositions. Their findings were published in 1940 and provided more comprehensive data on the organic and mineral makeup of foods. This exhaustive body of work has been updated and republished every few years to reflect changes in nutrient values and diets.
In 2003, researcher and purveyor of mineral supplements David Thomas compared the various sets of nutrition data from this research and found that, between 1940 and 1991, many vegetables had undergone a significant drop in nutritional value. Potatoes had lost almost half of their copper and iron, and 35 percent of their calcium. Meanwhile, broccoli saw an 80-percent drop in copper, an essential nutrient required for human growth and development. Thomas also discovered a 75-percent reduction in broccoli’s calcium content over the years.
“You would need to have eaten 10 tomatoes in 1991 to have obtained the same copper intake as one tomato would have given you in 1940,” Thomas wrote in his report. Significantly, many of these nutrient drops were in foods considered good sources for those same vitamins and minerals.
Thomas theorized that changes in agricultural practices could be damaging the soil and contributing to the overall nutritional depletion of food. Not everyone agreed — although many similar conclusions were popping up from other research.
Separate research in the late ’90s by nutrition researcher Anne-Marie Mayer and health writer Alex Jack similarly found that the nutritional value of fresh foods has dropped dramatically in the last half-century, likely due to the very methods the agriculture industry has worked to develop to increase efficiency and production.
Mayer analyzed government reports on vitamin and mineral levels in fresh produce from 1930 to 1980 in the United Kingdom. Her findings, published in a 1997 edition of the British Food Journal, included a 19-percent drop in calcium content in 20 vegetables, a 22-percent drop in iron, and a 14-percent slump in potassium. She suggested this nutrient decline could be related to the agriculture industry’s over-reliance on fertilizers, pesticides, soil compaction and plowing. These factors, Mayer said, represent environmental and genetic effects that could have altered fresh produce significantly over the course of half a century.
Jack investigated USDA food composition tables from 1975 and 1997 and found that calcium levels in 12 fresh vegetables had dropped by 27 percent; iron by 37 percent; vitamin A by 21 percent; and vitamin C by 30 percent. Jack concluded that the nutritional loss was the probable result of declining quality of soil, air and water, in addition to lowered seed quality.
Donald R. Davis, a research scientist from the Clayton Foundation Biochemical Institute of the University of Texas at Austin, saw all these studies and decided to follow up in the early 21st century with his own.
Davis and his team studied USDA nutritional data from 1950 and 1999 for 43 vegetables and fruits. Declines in protein, calcium, phosphorous, iron, riboflavin (vitamin B2) and ascorbic acid (vitamin C) were consistent. These findings were published in the Journal of the American College of Nutrition in 2004.
“Most people, including the authors of the first paper, tend to assume that these declines are caused by soil deficiencies and minerals,” Davis says. “But beginning with our paper, that didn’t really fit with the data. And although everybody believes soil decline affects the nutritional value of food, we didn’t find it.”
Primary causes of the nutrition deficit, Davis says, are actually twofold.
“One, we have more intensive agricultural growing methods that are designed to increase the yield, such as fertilizer and irrigation. The second factor is what plant breeders have been working hard to do, which is selective breeding and hybridization to also increase the yield by any means. Both of these are what I call the dilution effect.
You have the genetic dilution effect from selective breeding, and the environmental dilution effect from things like fertilizer. These are the major causes.”
Plants bred for size, such as commercially produced fruits and vegetables, expend their energy making big fruits, not on the absorption of micronutrients. Bigger fruits tend to mean fewer flavors, more water and fewer nutrients.
“One illustration of this is broccoli, which is one of the studies that has carefully documented the genetic dilution effect,” Davis says. “In a side-by-side study where they planted old and new varieties of broccoli — same field, same environment but different varieties — what they found, the larger the broccoli head, the lower the mineral concentrations in the head.”
Davis’ research unearthed the possibility that plants selected for mass production because of their quick seed-to-fruit ratio and yield may also possess reduced abilities to absorb minerals and process vitamins and nutrients. Heirloom (open-pollinated) seeds, on the other hand, are from older plant stocks that likely haven’t suffered nutritional declines.
It’s not just in the seeds themselves, either: It’s also how we cut, package and ship commercial produce that’s destroying their vitamin and mineral makeup. Catherine Barry-Ryan of the Dublin Institute of Technology and David O’Beirne from the University of Limerick performed a study to determine how various methods of processing affect the ascorbic acid (vitamin C) level in shredded iceberg lettuce. What they discovered is shocking: That machine-sliced bag of iceberg lettuce sitting on a supermarket shelf has up to 63 percent less vitamin C than a head of iceberg lettuce you take home and tear yourself.
Furthermore, bruised produce has an increased rate of nutrition loss and can affect a fruit’s ability to fully ripen. Damaged or injured tomato tissue, for example, has 15 percent less vitamin C than unbruised fruits. Mechanical harvesting has an inherently higher rate of bruising and damaging produce than handpicking.
A fruit only reaches its full nutritional value when it is fully ripe. That includes nutrients such as lycopene and beta-carotene, as well as carotenoids and vitamins A and C. The average commercially produced fruit or vegetable travels long distances to reach your table: One study found that many vegetables travel around 2,000 miles from vine to supermarket. Because of that time, and so the food will not rot on the journey, it must be picked well ahead of its ripeness. That means a tomato sold commercially is hardy, but not necessarily nutritious. It’s also going to be picked and shipped green, far before it’s reached its nutritional potential.
So while we have more access to produce than ever before, the fresh food we eat is significantly less nutritious than it once was. Research also suggests a correlation between micronutrient shortcomings and health problems. Micronutrient deficiency affects millions of people — and while deficiencies are a serious concern in those who are food insecure, research also finds micronutrient deficiencies in obese individuals worldwide, and across all age groups. Deficiencies can cause blindness, reproductive issues, mental impairment, reduced productivity, higher mortality rates and inadequate growth; their effects on obese populations have not been extensively studied.
The healthiest thing consumers can do is to start thinking critically about the sources of their fresh produce. For example, you can support no-till, biodynamic farming practices that nurture the soil. Biodynamics is a return to old-school farming, which means growing food without pesticides, genetically modified seeds, artificial fertilizers or antibiotics. Biodynamics relies on cover crops, compost, rotational planting and natural pest deterrents to make things grow healthfully. And it’s becoming easier to find farms practicing biodynamic methods, which impart fewer outside hindrances to plants as they grow, and offer more nutritious food to consumers.
At your local supermarket, ask which produce (if any) came from farms fewer than 200 miles away. Within that threshold, food is more likely to have grown to ripeness and been more recently delivered to the store. It’s also more likely to be selected for flavor and nutrition, as there isn’t so much pressure on its ability to survive a long trip. If your town has a farmers market, you can feel confident that much of what is being sold comes from heirloom varieties (often organic). Heirloom varieties are older varieties selected by generations of farmers before modern agriculture began to selectively breed based on productivity and hardiness. Because they were selected for taste and pest-resistance, these varieties are often tastier — and may have significantly more nutritional content than produce in stores. Many local farms also offer community-supported agriculture (CSA) programs allowing you to buy shares of weekly produce throughout the growing season.
To retain the nutritional value of the fresh food you bring home, cook and process it yourself. Boiling, microwaving, overcooking, or buying premade, preshredded, precut produce: All these processes may decrease the nutrient value of what you’re eating. Produce should be chopped just before cooking or eating to reduce the amount of lost oxidizing enzymes. No more precut, preshredded or presliced food.
And last, rely more on what you and your family and friends can grow in your own backyards. Growing your own means having total control over which varieties of food you eat, allowing you to select heirloom seeds loaded with nutrients, which you can then grow without artificial fertilizers or processing.
Always look for older, flavorful heirloom varieties of plants with lots of color (color means phytochemicals, such as anthocyanins, great for memory and anti-aging).
Start a container garden on your back deck for herbs, or try vertical walls and square-foot gardens inside or out. Trade any abundance from your own garden with that from your neighbors’. You can avoid having to buy nutrient-poor produce during the off season if you make a hobby out of canning, freezing, drying and otherwise preserving fresh produce yourself.
Nicole Caldwell is co-founder of Better Farm, a sustainability campus, animal sanctuary, artist colony and first-generation organic farm in Redwood, New York. Follow her adventures at Better Farm and on Instagram: Better Farm.
Sit in on dozens of practical workshops from the leading authorities on natural health, organic gardening, real food and more!LEARN MORE